The Wrong Question Gets Funded
Money is spent on activity before the real constraint is understood.
Project Readiness & Pricing
Before major capital can move into an empty building, someone must fund the work that makes the opportunity credible. GreenLit brings the evidence, people, commercial strategy, and delivery pathway together for one named building.
Commission the decision you need now, or choose the complete £126,000 GreenLit Package to coordinate the route from early uncertainty towards an investment ready proposition.
Discuss Pricing Across a PortfolioWhy Readiness Capital Matters
The first readiness investment protects later capital decisions by strengthening the evidence, relationships, responsibilities, and commercial direction before larger money is expected to enter.
Money is spent on activity before the real constraint is understood.
Councils, owners, communities, advisers, and funders work from different assumptions.
The amount, purpose, structure, and route to delivery remain unclear.
Separate commissions create handoffs, repetition, and lost accountability.
The first investment is not always in the building. It is in making the right building investable.
Compare the Three Decision GatesThree Separately Commissioned Gates
Every gate funds a different level of evidence and coordination. Each one ends with a visible decision so the buyer can proceed, pause, strengthen, reconsider, or stop before committing more money.
Gate 01
£6,000 Including VAT
DecisionGo or Pause
Commercial Question
Purpose
Create an initial evidence led view of the building, its context, and whether deeper readiness work is justified.
What the Buyer Funds
Value Created
A clear first decision, a prioritised evidence picture, and a proportionate next step.
Commission a Grand Grade™Gate 02
£60,000 Including VAT
DecisionGo, Stop, or Strengthen
Commercial Question
Purpose
Coordinate the people, evidence, specialist input, and viability direction needed to define a credible project route.
What the Buyer Funds
Value Created
A coordinated project direction with clearer risks, responsibilities, opportunities, and next decisions.
Discuss a Kick OffGate 03
£60,000 Including VAT
DecisionProceed or Reconsider
Commercial Question
Purpose
Turn the strengthened opportunity into a clear commercial, funding, impact, and delivery proposition.
What the Buyer Funds
Value Created
A proposition that appropriate funders, investors, and delivery partners can evaluate.
Prepare the Investment CaseChoose with Confidence
The Complete Package
£126,000Including VAT per Named Building
The GreenLit Package keeps the evidence, decisions, responsibilities, and next capital ask coordinated from beginning to end.
Clear ownership of the work from initial assessment through to the capital proposition.
Evidence and decisions move forward instead of being repeatedly recreated.
The project reaches funders and partners with clearer needs, risks, roles, and delivery logic.
Heritage, community, public, philanthropic, place based, and impact capital can fund the work that makes larger investment possible.
Where the Budget Goes
The commission funds the coordinated evidence, expertise, technology, specialist inputs, and decision making work required to create a credible next move.
Scope, responsibilities, specialist inputs, impact requirements, and expected outputs are agreed before commissioning.
The agreed budget enters the readiness programme.
The work strengthens the project and its commercial direction.
Go, Pause, Stop, Strengthen, Proceed, or Reconsider.
The next requirement is clearer and better evidenced.
Appropriate capital and partners can evaluate the opportunity.
How Capital Moves
Readiness capital pays for the work that turns a building opportunity into a proposition that larger funders, investors, and delivery partners can assess.
The GreenLit Package does not replace development capital. It helps create the conditions in which development capital can enter more responsibly.
Impact That Capital Providers Can Understand
GreenLit projects can incorporate impact measurement and management so capital providers, councils, communities, and delivery partners can understand the social, economic, environmental, and place based value a project is intended to create.
Support for defining, measuring, and communicating the social value created relative to the resources invested, where appropriate to the project and agreed scope.
Clear outcomes, indicators, stakeholder evidence, baselines, targets, and reporting requirements that can help funders understand whether intended impact is being achieved.
A clearer link between the project’s funding requirement, intended outcomes, beneficiaries, delivery responsibilities, and evidence needed by capital providers.
A structure that supports monitoring, review, and improvement as a project moves from readiness towards funding and delivery.
Grand Bequest’s regeneration work is most directly aligned with the following United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.
Regeneration can support employment, local supply chains, skills, productive reuse, and inclusive economic activity.
Bringing empty and underused buildings back into useful life can support inclusive places, community resilience, housing, heritage, and sustainable urban development.
Building reuse can retain embodied value, reduce waste, support circular construction, and make more responsible use of existing assets.
SDG alignment describes contribution themes. It does not imply United Nations endorsement, partnership, certification, or guaranteed impact.
Greater Efficiency Through Scale
The current £126,000 price reflects the multidisciplinary readiness work required for one named building. Grand Bequest intends to reduce the unit cost over time through platform automation, reusable evidence, standardised workflows, repeat delivery, and larger project bundles.
Automation, reusable data, and standardised workflows.
Reduced duplication, repeat partners, and faster coordination.
Shared procurement, evidence, and programme governance.
Common programme costs spread across more buildings.
Use the £126,000 GreenLit Package as the current reference point for one named building.
Agree a shared scope, evidence approach, programme, and delivery model across multiple projects.
Design a readiness programme around available capital, target outcomes, and the number of buildings.
The more buildings that move through one coordinated programme, the more common costs can be shared and the less each building should need to carry alone.
Portfolio and bundle pricing is scoped separately and must reflect genuine shared efficiencies. No specific future price reduction is guaranteed.
Discuss Portfolio PricingWho Can Commission or Fund the Work
Create a more stable, prioritised, and investment ready pipeline of empty building opportunities.
Discuss a Council PipelineFund the next credible decision for one named building instead of commissioning unconnected advice.
Start with Your BuildingSupport the evidence, viability, community, and impact work that can unlock larger pools of capital.
Fund Project ReadinessSupport a readiness programme that prepares projects before they reach investment committees.
Discuss an Investment PipelineCreate a credible route from local ambition to evidence, funding, impact, and delivery conversations.
Discuss a Community Led ProjectEnter projects with clearer constraints, responsibilities, commercial logic, and stakeholder context.
Explore a Delivery PartnershipCommercial Questions
Clear answers about commissioning, capital, impact, scope, and what happens next.
The price reflects a coordinated multidisciplinary readiness programme for one named building. It funds evidence, project leadership, technology, specialist inputs, stakeholder coordination, commercial development, impact requirements, and decision ready outputs across all three gates.
Yes. Grand Grade™, Kick Off, and Investment Readiness can each be commissioned separately. The right starting point depends on the decision you need to make and the evidence already available.
No. Readiness work is designed to improve decisions, not predetermine them. A responsible result may be to proceed, pause, strengthen, reconsider, or stop.
Potentially, yes. A council, philanthropic funder, impact investor, place based partner, or other sponsor may fund readiness work for a named building or programme, subject to an agreed scope and appropriate relationships with the building owner and project stakeholders.
The scope can be shaped around a defined decision and available readiness budget where that budget can support credible work. Grand Bequest will make clear what can and cannot be achieved within the proposed scope.
Larger bundles may create genuine efficiencies through shared procurement, evidence, technology, workflows, delivery partners, and programme governance. Portfolio pricing is scoped separately, and no specific future reduction is guaranteed.
The next step depends on the evidence and decision reached. It may include funding applications, investment conversations, delivery partner engagement, planning work, procurement, further specialist work, or a decision to pause or reconsider.
No. The GreenLit Package funds project readiness. Construction, acquisition, major design development, statutory fees, and delivery capital are separate unless explicitly included in an agreed scope.
Potentially, yes. Social Return on Investment, impact measurement and management, outcome frameworks, indicators, and reporting requirements can be incorporated where they are relevant and agreed within the project scope.
Grand Bequest’s work supports themes associated with decent work and economic growth, sustainable cities and communities, and responsible consumption and production. The precise contribution depends on the building, intended use, delivery model, and agreed impact outcomes.
Your Next Decision
Whether you have one named building, capital looking for projects, an impact objective, or a place-based portfolio, choose the route that best matches the decision you need to make next.
Discuss a Portfolio, Capital, or Impact PartnershipContact Us
Have a building, place, question, or contribution in mind?